Research on the Performance of Industrial Carbon Emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Three-stage SM-DEA-Malmquist

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0197

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 161-167.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0197

• Application Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on the Performance of Industrial Carbon Emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Three-stage SM-DEA-Malmquist

LI Gen-zhong¹, ZHU hong-liang²

1. School of Law and Business, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China;
2. School of Engineering Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received:2020-08-18 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-20

基于三阶段SM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究

李根忠¹, 朱洪亮²

1.三江学院法商学院,江苏南京 210012;
2.南京大学工程管理学院,江苏南京 210039

通讯作者: 朱洪亮(1973-),男,江苏南京人,副教授,研究方向为金融工程、产业经济。
作者简介:李根忠(1977-),男,山东嘉祥人,讲师,研究方向为产业经济、环境经济。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科基金资助项目(21YJC790021)

Abstract

Abstract: For recent years, the issue of carbon emission has been concerned about by scholars from all walks of life. In order to evaluate the regional carbon emission performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, this paper combines the three-stage SBM-DEA model of unexpected output with Malmquist index to calculate and analyze the carbon emission efficiency of 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2011 to 2019. The model excludes the impact of environmental factors and random variables, making the calculation results more consistent with the actual situation. The results show that the carbon emission performance of the Yangtze River Economic Belt shows an overall upward trend, and there is a differentiation characteristic of eastern>central>western regions. Internal management has a significant positive effect on the improvement of carbon emission efficiency, and increasing talent introduction and technology exchange frequency in the eastern, central and western regions is conducive to improving carbon emission efficiency.

Key words: yangtze river economic belt, three-order SBM-DEA model, malmquist index, carbon emission efficiency

摘要： 碳排放问题近年来备受各界学者所关注。为评价长江经济带区域内碳排放绩效,本文结合非期望产出的三阶段SBM-DEA模型和Malmquist指数对2011~2019年长江经济带11省市碳排放效率测算及动静态分析,该模型剔除了环境因素和随机变量的影响,使得测算结果更加符合实际情况。研究表明:长江经济带碳排放绩效呈整体上升态势,且存在东部>中部>西部差异化特征,内部管理对碳排放效率提升的正向作用明显,加大东中西部地区的人才引入及技术交流频度,有助于提升碳排放效率。

关键词: 长江经济带, 三阶SBM-DEA模型, Malmquist指数, 碳排放效率

CLC Number:

F272

LI Gen-zhong, ZHU hong-liang. Research on the Performance of Industrial Carbon Emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Three-stage SM-DEA-Malmquist[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(6): 161-167.

李根忠, 朱洪亮. 基于三阶段SM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 161-167.

References

[1] 李庆.长江经济带城市二氧化碳排放空间异质性分析[J].生态经济,2020,36(12):21-28.
[2] Mielnik O. Goldemberg J. Communication the evolution of the “carbonization index” in developing countries[J]. Energy Policy, 1999, 27(5): 307-308.
[3] Jiankun He, LanLan Lu, et al. The win-win pathway of economic growth and CO₂ emission reduction:a case study for China[J]. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 16(03): 220-231.
[4] Zaim O, Taskin F. Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emission in the OECD: a non-parametric approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 58(2): 95-107.
[5] 陆敏,王增武.基于DEA模型的中国碳排放管制效率研究[J].生态经济,2019,35(06):13-17.
[6] DI ZHOU, XIAORU ZHANG. Research on coupling degree and coupling path between China's carbon emission efficiency and industrial structure upgrading[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 27(20): 25149-25163.
[7] 余敦勇,张雪花,刘文莹.基于随机前沿分析方法的碳排放效率分析[J].中国人口资源余环境,2015,25(2):21-24.
[8] 平智毅,吴学兵.长江经济带碳排放效率的时空差异及其影响因素分析[J].生态经济,2020,36(3):31-37.
[9] 张德刚,市场分割对碳排放效率的影响研究——基于固定效应面板随机前沿模型[J].软科学,2018,32(09):94-97.
[10] 张丽峰.碳排放约束下中国全要素生产率测算与分解研究——基于随机前沿分析(SFA)方法[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(12):20-24.
[11] 成远,乔观民,梅思雨,宁爱凤.基于SBM-DEA浙江省碳排放效率时空演变研究[J].资源开发与市场,2021,37(12):1-12.
[12] 王兆峰,杜瑶瑶.基于SBM-DEA模型湖南省碳排放效率时空差异及影响因素分析[J].干地理科学,2019,39(05):797-806.
[13] 徐国泉,栾昊.江苏碳排放空间差异性及影响因素分析-基于三阶段SBM_DEA模型分析[J].生态经济,2018,34(7):33-38
[14] 陈晓红,易国栋,刘翔.基于三阶段SBM-DEA模型的中国区域碳排放效率研究[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(03):115-122.
[15] 余光英,员开奇.湖南省土地利用碳排放动态效率研究:基于Malmquist指数模型[J].环境科学与技术,2015,38(2):189-194.
[16] 胡剑波,闫烁,韩君.中国产业部门隐含碳排放效率研究——基于三阶段DEA模型与非竞争型I-O模型的实证分析[J].统计研究2021,38(06):30-43.
[17] 宋金昭,陈策,王晓平.基于超效率三阶段DEA模型的建筑业碳排放研究[J].环境科学与技术2019,42(01):193-200.
[18] 姜国刚,阮婉妮.基于三阶段DEA的江苏石化产业碳排放效率分析[J].环境科学与技术2019,42(03):172-179.
[19] 唐德才,张燕,王路霞.长江经济带碳排放能力综合评价研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(6):44-50.
[20] 李兰兰,於忠祥,秦岩,曹益君.基于STIRPAT模型的长江经济带农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分析[J].安徽农业大学学报,2020,29(5):32-37,132.
[21] 黎振强,周秋阳.产业结构升级是否有助于促进碳减排——基于长江经济带地区的实证研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(8):34-40.
[22] 吴昊玥,何宇,陈文宽.中国农业碳排放效率测度、空间溢出与影响因素[J].中国生态农业学报,2021,29(10):1762-1773.
[23] 王鑫静,程珏.城镇化对碳排放效率的影响机制研究——基于全球118个国家面板数据的实证分析[J].世界地理研究,2020,29(03):503-511.
[24] 王兆峰,汪倩.长江经济带新型城镇化对旅游业碳排放的门槛效应研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(01):13-24.
[25] 张齐建,刘清,丁绪辉.长江经济带碳解锁效率研究——基于SE-DEA-Malmquist指数[J].华东经济管理,2021,35(06):1-10.
[26] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in date envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509.
[27] Tone K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: aslacks-based measure(SBM)approach[C]. The Operations Research Society of Japan, 2004.
[28] Fried H O. Schmidt S S, et al. Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in date envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2002, 17(1-2): 157-174.
[29] Kumbhakar S C, Lovell Knox C A. Stochastic frontier analysis[M]. Cambridge University Press, 200. 136-142.
[30] SHAN Y, HUANG Q, GUAN D, et al. China CO₂ emission accounts 2016~2017[J]. Scientific Data, 2020, 7(54).
[31] 李亚丽,杨宗之,黄和平.多维度高质量城镇化对能源消费碳排放的传导机制研究[J].中国环境管理,2021,13(06):81-89.
[32] Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, etc. Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J]. The American Economist, 1994(84): 66-83.

Research on the Performance of Industrial Carbon Emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Three-stage SM-DEA-Malmquist

基于三阶段SM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 6

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	LI Gen-zhong, ZHU Hong-liang. Research on industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity in The Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(5): 227-231.
[2]	LIU Chao, FU Ruo-yu, LI Jia-hui, ZHOU Wen-wen. Research into Financing Efficiency of Artificial IntelligenceIndustry Based on DEA-Tobit Method [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(6): 144-152.
[3]	DUAN Yong-rui, JING Yi-fang, LI Gui-ping. Chinese Commercial Bank Efficiency Evaluation Based on Two-stage DEA [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(2): 118-125.
[4]	DONG Feng, LIU Xiao-yan, LONG Ru-yin, ZHOU De-qun. Analysis of Carbon Emission Efficiency in China Based on Three-Stage DEA Model [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(4): 196-205.
[5]	HAN Ke, CHEN Bao-feng. An Empirical Study on Operating Efficiency of Property Insurance Companies in China Based on DEA-Malmquist Index [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(1): 196-202.
[6]	JIANG Xiang-yang, REN Pei-yu, LI Yun-yao, LIU Dao-bo, ZHANG Yong-pan. Research on Business Efficiency of China Retail Chain Enterprise Based on Data Envelopment Analysis [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2011, 20(5): 185-192.