基金“拥挤交易”对A股股价泡沫的影响研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0182

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 237-244.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0182

基金“拥挤交易”对A股股价泡沫的影响研究

贾丽娜,扈文秀,章伟果

西安理工大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安710054

收稿日期:2014-10-29 出版日期:2015-10-12
作者简介:贾丽娜(1985-),女,山西阳泉人,博士生,研究方向:投资管理与资本运作;扈文秀(1964-),男,河南新乡人,博士生导师,研究方向:投资管理与资本运作;章伟果(1984-),男,浙江永康人,讲师,研究方向:投资管理与资本运作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71373204)不同标的资产价格泡沫生成演化的共性机理研究;陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地科学研究计划项目(13JZ036);陕西省普通高校重点学科专项资金建设项目(107-5X1302)

Study on the Influence of the Crowding Trade of Securities
Investment Funds on Stock Bubble

JIA Li-na, HU Wen-xiu, ZHANG Wei-guo

Xi’an University of technology, School of Business Administration, Xi’an, 710054

Received:2014-10-29 Online:2015-10-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着基金数量的不断增加,多家基金重仓一只股票所呈现的“拥挤交易”现象日渐明显。本文运用面板数据模型,对基金“拥挤交易”与A股股价泡沫之间的关系进行考察。结果表明,当公司超过6只基金重仓持股时,基金拥挤交易会对股价泡沫形成促进作用;当小于6只基金重仓持股时,这一关系则不显著。即:基金拥挤交易需要在“拥挤”到一定程度后才会促进股价泡沫膨胀。因此,管理层应高度重视6家以上基金重仓持股的股票,这类股票往往会形成较大的泡沫,同时也存在较大的崩溃风险。另外,管理层还应审慎研究政策出台时可能带来的预期,最大限度的避免基金经理产生一致的信念和一致行动,降低基金拥挤交易现象的发生。

关键词: 证券投资基金, 拥挤交易, 股价泡沫

Abstract: With the number of Securities Investment Funds increasing, the phenomenon of crowding trade that many funds heavily hold the same stocks at the same time is obvious. This paper collects the panel data to analyse the relationship between the crowding trade of funds and stock bubble. The result shows that when more than six funds hold the stock, the crowding trade will promote bubble formation. On the contrary, when the stock hold by less than six funds, the relationships between the above mentioned is not obvious. This means that the relationship needs to meet the certain conditions. Therefore, management should pay great attention to the stock held by more than six funds, for such stocks tend to form larger bubbles, and at the same time there is a greater risk of collapse. In addition, management should also be careful about the market expectations by the policy before it is approved so as to prevent fund managers from having the same belief and actions whenever possible, in order to reduce the fund crowded trade phenomenon.

Key words: securities investment funds, crowding trade, stock bubble

中图分类号:

F830.591

贾丽娜,扈文秀,章伟果. 基金“拥挤交易”对A股股价泡沫的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5): 237-244.

JIA Li-na, HU Wen-xiu, ZHANG Wei-guo. Study on the Influence of the Crowding Trade of Securities
Investment Funds on Stock Bubble[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(5): 237-244.

参考文献

[1]Dass N, Massa M, Patgiri R. Mutual funds and bubbles: the surprising role of contractual incentives[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2008, 21(1): 51-99.
[2]Davis E P. The role of institutional investors in the evolution of financial structure and behavior[J]. The Future of the Financial System, 1996, (33): 49-99.
[3]Dasgupta A, Prat A, Verardo M. The price impact of institutional herding[J]. Review of Financial Study, 2011, (24): 1-38.
[4]蔡庆丰,杨侃,林剑波.羊群行为的叠加及其市场影响——基于证券分析师与机构投资者行为的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2011,(12):111-121.
[5]Griffin J M, Harris J H, Tao S, Topaloglu S. Who drive and burst tech bubbles?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2011, 64(4): 1257-1290.
[6]潘越,戴亦一,陈梅婷.基金经理的投资经验、交易行为与股市泡沫[J].中国工业经济,2011,(01):120-129.
[7]Temin P, Voth H J. Riding the south sea bubble[J]. American Economic Review, 2004, 95(5): 1654-1668.
[8]Brunnermeier M K, Nagel S. Hedge funds and the technology bubble[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(5): 2013-2040.
[9]Sharma V, Easterwood J C, Kumar R. Institutional herding and the internet bubble[J]. University of Michigan Dearborn and Virginia Tech, 2005.
[10]陈国进,马柯.投资者面临泡沫的理性行为:抛售、旁观还是骑乘?[J].上海经济研究,2012,(03):84-92.
[11]Stein J C. Presidential address: sophisticated investors and market efficiency[J]. Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(4): 1517-1548.
[12]陈国进,陶可.机构投资者的拥挤效应与蓝筹股泡沫[J].系统工程,2011,(02):1-8.
[13]Frankel R M, Lee C M. Accounting valuation, market expectation, and the book-to-market effect[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1998, 25(3): 283-319.
[14]Gompers P A, Metriek A. Institutional investors and equity prices[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economies, 2001, 116(1): 229-260.
[15]张维,张永杰.异质信念、卖空限制与风险资产价格[J].管理科学学报,2006,(04):58-64.
[16]吴卫星,汪勇祥,梁衡义.过度自信、有限参与和资产价格泡沫[J].经济研究,2006,(04):115-127.
[17]古志辉,郝项超,张永杰.卖空约束、投资者行为和A股市场的定价泡沫[J].金融研究,2011,(02):129-148.
[18]Gomes F J. Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors[J]. Journal of Business, 2005, 78: 675-706.
[19]Gennotte G, Leland H. Market liquidity, hedging and crashes[J]. American Economic Review, 1990, 80(5): 999-1021.
[20]张艳.我国证券市场泡沫形成机制研究——基于进化博弈的复制动态模型分析[J].管理世界,2005,(10):34-40.
[21]何佳,何基报,王霞,翟伟丽.机构投资者一定能够稳定股市吗?——来自中国的经验证据[J].管理世界,2007,(08):35-42.
[22]Barron O E, Karpoff J M. Information precision, transaction casts, and trading[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2004, (28): 1207-1223 .
[23]Hong H, Scheinkman J A, Wei X. Advisors and asset prices; a model of the origins of bubbles[J]. Journal of Financicl Economics, 2008, 89: 268-287.
[24]Pastor L, Veronesi P. Was there a nasdaq bubble in the late 1990s[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 81(1): 61-100.
[25]Odean T. Do investors trade too much[J]. American Economic Review, 1999, 89(6): 1279-1298.
[26]Goetzmann W N, Massa M. Dispersion of opinion and stock returns[J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2005, 8(3): 324-349.

基金“拥挤交易”对A股股价泡沫的影响研究

Study on the Influence of the Crowding Trade of Securities
Investment Funds on Stock Bubble

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	贾丽娜, 王芳云, 李慧瑛, 孙辉. 我国基金博彩型股票交易是博彩偏好的结果吗？——基于信息挖掘视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 191-197.
[2]	贾丽娜, 扈文秀. 投资者情绪对基金羊群效应的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(6): 191-199.

基金“拥挤交易”对A股股价泡沫的影响研究

Study on the Influence of the Crowding Trade of SecuritiesInvestment Funds on Stock Bubble

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

Study on the Influence of the Crowding Trade of Securities
Investment Funds on Stock Bubble