可用性观点下的烟叶质量粗糙集评价方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0104

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 219-226.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0104

可用性观点下的烟叶质量粗糙集评价方法

谭旭^1,2, 毛太田², 邹凯²

1.深圳信息职业技术学院软件学院,广东深圳 518172;
2.湘潭大学公共管理学院,湖南湘潭 411005

收稿日期:2013-10-09 出版日期:2015-06-12
作者简介:谭旭(1981-),男,湖南株洲人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事粒计算和多属性评价决策分析的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101096);广东省自然科学基金资助项目(S2012010008540);深圳市科技研发资金基础研究计划项目(JC201105190819A)

Quality Evaluation on Tobacco Leaf Based on Rough Set Theory: A View of Usability

TAN Xu^1,2, MAO Tai-tian², ZOU Kai²

1.School of Software Engineering, Shenzhen Inst. of Info. Technol., Shenzhen 518172, China;
2.School of Public Management, Xiangtan Univ., Xiangtan 411005, China

Received:2013-10-09 Online:2015-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对现代卷烟产业中烟叶质量新需求的理解和归纳,构建了可用性观点下的烟叶质量综合评价新指标体系。考虑到实际烟叶质量评价中的数据的复杂性和问题求解的特殊性,将基于等价关系的Pawlak粗糙集模型扩展为基于上、下近似相似关系的扩展粗糙集模型,并设计了相应的可用性观点下烟叶质量粗糙集智能评价模型,在实现了不依赖主观先验信息求取各指标客观权重的同时,进一步引入了专家的主观权重信息,以达到对烟叶“可用性”需求的动态调整。文章首次尝试了基于定量化解决途径来应用和阐释烟叶的“可用性”概念,文末的实证分析验证了本文方法的可行性和一定程度的优越性。

关键词: 烟叶质量, 粗糙集理论, 相似关系, 可用性, 综合评价

Abstract: By digesting new requirements and influencing factors of tobacco leaf quality in modern cigarette industry, a novel comprehensive evaluation index system of tobacco leaf quality under the view of usability is built up. Regarding the complexity and diversity of index data and the particularity of problem through the assessment, we try to extend Pawlak rough set model to a new kind of rough set model based on upper-lower similarity relation, and construct an intelligent rough set model for tobacco leaf quality evaluation under the view of usability in further. In this way, objective index weights calculated by historical data without prior knowledge and subjective index weights based on expert experiences, are put forward to reach the dynamic understanding of tobacco leaf usability. So, it’s the first time we’ve tried to apply and express the concept of usability in a quantitative way. At the end of this paper, a flavorful tobacco leaf selection example is given to prove the feasibility and superiority.

Key words: tobacco leaf quality, rough set theory, similarity relation, usability, comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

谭旭, 毛太田, 邹凯. 可用性观点下的烟叶质量粗糙集评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(3): 219-226.

TAN Xu, MAO Tai-tian, ZOU Kai. Quality Evaluation on Tobacco Leaf Based on Rough Set Theory: A View of Usability[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(3): 219-226.

参考文献

[1] Daniel Layten Davis, Mark Nielsen T. Tobacco-production, chemistry and technology[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1999.
[2] Sun Weifeng, Zhou Zhilei, Li Yue. Differentiation of flue-cured tobacco leaves in different positions based on neutral volatiles with principal component analysis(PCA)[J] .European Food Research and Technology, 2012, 235(4): 745-752.
[3] 张延军,李旭华,林锐锋.主成分回归分析法在永州烟叶评吸质量与外观质量的关系模型构建中的应用[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(18):260-265.
[4] Zhang Fan, Zhang Xinhong. Classification and quality evaluation of tobacco leaves based on image processing and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Sensors, 2011, 11(3): 2369-2384.
[5] 冯天瑾,丁香乾.计算智能与科学配方[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[6] 殷勇.烟草成分对其品质影响程度的粗糙集判别方法[J].农业机械学报,2004,35(4):124-127.
[7] Zdzislaw Pawlak. Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis[J]. Cybernetics & Systems, 1998, 29(7): 661-688.
[8] 李华雄,周献中,李天瑞.决策粗糙集理论及其研究进展[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
[9] Yao Yiyu, Yao Bingxue. Covering based rough set approximations[J]. Information Sciences, 2012, 200: 91-107.
[10] Zbigniew Bonikowski, Edward Bryniarski, Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska. Extensions and intentions in the rough set theory[J]. Information Sciences, 1998, 107(1-4): 149-167.
[11] Wojciech Ziarko. Variable precision rough set model[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1993, 46(1): 39-59.
[12] 张双红,潘中兴.论卷烟产品内在风格[J].烟草科技,1996,(2):7-8.
[13] 沈光林.烟草内在质量评价体系的系统研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2001.
[14] 朱尊权.烟叶的可用性与卷烟的安全性[J].烟草科技,2000,(8):3-6.
[15] Krzysztof Dembczyńskia, Salvatore Greco, Roman Slowiński. Rough set approach to multiple criteria classification with imprecise evaluations and assignments[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 198(2): 626-636.
[16] Wei Wei, Liang Jiye, Qian Yuhua. A comparative study of rough sets for hybrid data[J]. Information Sciences, 2012, 190(1): 1-16.
[17] Xu Weihua, Li Yuan, Liao Xiuwu. Approaches to attribute reductions based on rough set and matrix computation in inconsistent ordered information systems[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 27: 78-91.
[18] 谭旭,高妍方,陈英武.区间型多属性决策求解新方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(7):1082-1085.
[19] 吴殿信,袁志永,闫克玉,等.烤烟各等级烟叶质量指数的确定[J].烟草科技,2001,(12):9-15.
[20] 舒欢,刘文娜.基于组合赋权—TOPSIS 模型的水利工程建设方案优选决策方法[J].工程管理学报,2013,27(4):83-86.

可用性观点下的烟叶质量粗糙集评价方法

Quality Evaluation on Tobacco Leaf Based on Rough Set Theory: A View of Usability

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李清水, 李登峰, 李辉, 余高锋. 基于前景理论的区域绿色经济发展水平多指标评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 118-123.
[2]	张晓文, 赵普, 纪爱兵. 基于直觉模糊集的世界一流学科建设成效评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 205-210.
[3]	侯芳. 基于随机优胜连接行为的犹豫模糊群组评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 183-189.
[4]	许世存, 易平涛, 郭亚军, 宫诚举. 基于数值分布的激励型综合评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 117-121.
[5]	吴浩然, 王二威, 齐延信. 基于Vague集的珠三角城市民生状况评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 137-141.
[6]	杨锴, 赵希男, 周岩. 考虑二次优势判别的动态竞优评价方法及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 139-147.
[7]	范德成, 宋志龙. 基于Gini准则的客观组合评价方法研究——以高技术产业技术创新能力评价为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 148-157.
[8]	孙冬营, 佘靖雯, 褚钰, 许叶军, 王慧敏. 水资源配置方案综合评价中的信息损失测度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 124-129.
[9]	李伟伟, 易平涛, 李玲玉,. 综合评价中异常值的识别及无量纲化处理方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 173-178.
[10]	范德成, 杜明月. 基于TOPSIS灰色关联投影法的高技术产业技术创新能力动态综合评价——以京津冀一体化为视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 154-163.
[11]	郭亚军, 阮泰学, 宫诚举. 基于主客观信息综合判断的非线性拉开档次法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(6): 149-154.
[12]	宫诚举, 郭亚军, 李玲玉, 李伟伟. 群体信息集结过程中无量纲化方法的选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(5): 151-157.
[13]	周美辰, 郭亚军, 李伟伟. 生态文明发展状况的动态奖惩评价及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(10): 166-172.
[14]	易平涛, 周义, 郭亚军, 李伟伟. 一种体现发展趋势的动态综合评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(6): 175-180.
[15]	周荣喜,徐步祥,单欣涛,张英奎. 基于变权函数的水质综合评价多属性决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 99-105.