运筹与管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 142-148.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2023.0229

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于贝叶斯网络的新冠肺炎区域风险等级划分准确性评估

蔡玫1, 曹杰2   

  1. 1.南京信息工程大学 管理工程学院,江苏 南京 210044;
    2.徐州工程学院 管理工程学院,江苏 徐州 221018
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-28 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-08-24
  • 作者简介:蔡玫(1980-),女,江苏南京人,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向:应急管理,模糊决策;曹杰(1973-),安徽舒城人,男,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向:应急管理,系统决策。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目(16ZDA054);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71871121)

Accuracy Assessment of COVID-19 Pandemic Regional Risk Classification Based on Bayesian Network

CAI Mei1, CAO Jie2   

  1. 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    2. School of Management Engineering, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China
  • Received:2021-04-28 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-08-24

摘要: 新冠肺炎在我国爆发后,分区分级管控措施已经取得了良好的效果,但研判的准确度有待商榷。提出基于不精确概率的贝叶斯网络决策模型,评估疫情区域风险等级划分的准确度。采用贝叶斯网络结构表征风险等级划分过程,并进行了数学描述。通过分析疫情防控中收集的证据,提炼出网络节点状态的不精确概率数值,并将其转化成真、假、不确定三个状态的基本概率分配函数;运用扩展的证据合成技术传递节点的不确定性,评估风险等级划分的准确性。结果表明:区域风险等级划分为中风险的判断准确性较高,而低、高风险的判断准确性较低;疫情防控进入常态化后,精准防控还应结合风险等级的准确度重点考虑低、高风险区域经济社会的秩序安排,以适应应急管理科学化、专业化、智能化、精细化的需要。

关键词: 应急决策, 风险评估, 贝叶斯网络, 不精确概率, 证据理论

Abstract: After COVID-19 Pandemic broke out in China, China’s epidemic prevention and control policy has always adhered to scientific measures and precise prevention and control, which not only maximized the protection of people’s life safety and health, but also minimized the impact of the epidemic on economic and social development. The measures of regional classification control have achieved good results. However, the accuracy of the judgement is still open to question. In order to adjust and optimize the prevention and control measures according to the time and situation, it is of great significance to conduct research on the accuracy of regional risk level classification of COVID-19.
A Bayesian network decision-making model based on imprecise probability is proposed to evaluate the accuracy of regional risk classification of the new epidemic. First, the imprecise probability is used as the input parameter of the Bayesian network, that is, the key events in the epidemic are described with low probability and high probability. Then, by analyzing the regional risk level classification policy of COVID-19, we constructed a Bayesian network to represent the regional risk level classification process, and the mathematical description of the classification rule is carried out. Based on the analysis of the existing evidence collected in the epidemic prevention and control process, the imprecise probabilities of network nodes are extracted, and basic probability assignment functions of three states (true, false and uncertainty) are provided, so as to determine the nodes and range of nodes in a Bayesian network. Finally, an extended D-S (Dempster-Shafer) fusion technique is used to transfer the uncertainty of network nodes and to obtain joint probabilities on nodes from imprecise probabilities. The accuracy estimation of risk classification is obtained.
According to Prevention and Control of COVID-19 (Fifth Edition), we applied relevant data published by the media and clinical data of Central South Hospital of Wuhan University to our Bayesian network decision-making model. The results show that: The accuracy of regional risk classification of medium risk is higher, while those of low and high risk are low. The following suggestions are drawn based on above results: (1)The uncertainty of the assessment results in low-risk areas is significant. The vast majority of regions in the country belong to this risk level, with a large base, and the analysis should be particularly precise, otherwise small errors will bring great fluctuations. (2)The uncertainty of the assessment results in high-risk areas is the greatest. Although there are few high-risk areas designated, strict prevention and control of high-risk areas have a significant negative impact on the production and life of the people in the area and surrounding areas. Over prevention and control can also harm the phased achievements of the epidemic. (3)More evidence is needed to improve the accuracy of regional risk classification. On the one hand, the accuracy of the accuracy assessment system’s research results can be improved by improving the accuracy of the evaluation criteria; More evidence can be added to make the system’s rules more complete, especially for judgments of low and high risks. For example, improving the accuracy of confirmed cases through multiple nucleic acid tests. When epidemic prevention and control enter normalization, precision prevention and control should also focus on the economic and social activity order of low and high-risk areas, so as to meet the needs of scientific, professional, intelligent and refined emergency management.
Compared with fuzzy Bayesian network method and risk assessment method based on reliability theory, the proposal uses extended D-S evidence fusion technology to reduce the amount of calculation. And the information has been fully applied to solve the problem of knowledge uncertainty caused by data scarcity, data discontinuity, data incompleteness and prior ignorance. At the same time, the proposal can also solve the problem of information fusion when there are significant evidence conflicts, thereby improving the accuracy of decision-making. Our research focuses on the emergency management of public health events from another perspective, providing theoretical support for scientific decision-making and precise implementation. However, the regional risk classification of COVID-19 is a dynamic process. With the change of anti-epidemic situation, the adjustment and optimization of prevention and control measures can study the dynamic Bayesian network or the closed-loop dynamic Bayesian network topology.

Key words: emergency decision-making, risk assessment, Bayesian network, imprecise probability, evidence theory

中图分类号: