运筹与管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 162-168.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2023.0130

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

异构偏好信息下的主客方协作式群体评价方法及应用

张发明1, 牛玉飞2, 王伟明3   

  1. 1.桂林电子科技大学 商学院,广西 桂林 541004;
    2.南昌大学 经济管理学院,江西 南昌 330031;
    3.江西财经大学 工商管理学院,江西 南昌 330032
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-06-07
  • 通讯作者: 张发明(1980-),男,江西临川人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:综合评价与决策支持,信息融合等。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72161006,72104122);教育部人文社科基金项目(21XJA630009,22XJA630003);江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人项目(20194BCJ22001);广西自然科学基金(2021JJA180078);广西哲学社会科学规划项目(21FGL037);广西新文科研究与实践项目(XWK2022011)

Group Evaluation Method and Its Application Based on Subject-object Collaboration with Heterogeneous Preference Structures

ZHANG Faming1, NIU Yufei2, WANG Weiming3   

  1. 1. Business School, Guilin University of Electronic Science and technology, Guilin 541004, China;
    2. School of Economics & Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
    3. School of Business Adminastration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330032, China
  • Received:2021-03-10 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-06-07

摘要: 针对异构偏好信息下的主客方协作式群体评价问题,提出一种新的基于两次协作过程的群体评价方法。首先,分别使用不确定语言和区间灰数对主客双方的意见进行描述,并给出各评价值的协作初始得分;其次,由协作初始得分计算主方信息“完备度”和客方信息“诚信度”,并运用相应的调节因子实现对双方各评价值的修正,完成双方的“第一次协作”;再次,运用灰关联聚类和TDWA算子分别对修正后评价信息的TOPSIS综合贴近度进行聚类和集结,完成双方的“第二次协作”并得出评价对象的综合评价得分;最后,以一个实际例子验证所提方法的有效性与可行性。对比分析结果表明,两次协作过程可有效增强双方评价信息交互的精度与深度,稳步实现异构偏好意见的双向交互与有机融合,从而提升评价结果的合理性和稳定性。

关键词: 主客方协作式群体评价, 异构偏好, 不确定语言, 区间灰数, 调节因子

Abstract: Due to the increasingly complex decision-making environment, the resolution to some large-scale decision-making problems often requires group evaluation methods to improve the scientificity and decision-making quality. However, in previous relevant studies, most of them have not considered the participation of object side, and the expansion of applicable pattern is relatively insufficient. At the same time, most of the existing group evaluation methods based on subject-object collaboration have not considered the situation where both sides are willing to express their opinions by using heterogeneous preference information. Also, the interaction between the subject and object sides is relatively inadequate and the comprehensive correction effect of information is not obvious. Aiming at these problems, in this paper, a new collaborative group evaluation method is proposed based on heterogeneous preference information. After using uncertain language and interval grey number to express the evaluation opinion of each side respectively, the interaction and fusion of their opinions are realized through two collaborative processes.
The goal of the “First Collaboration” between the subject and object is to correct the evaluation information. Firstly, the collaborative initial score of each evaluation value is given, and the principles of both sides are consistent. In detail, the calculations are realized based on the deviation degree of uncertain language and the relatively accurate integrated value of interval grey number respectively. Secondly, the “Completeness Degree” and “Trustworthy Degree” of corresponding information are calculated based on collaborative initial scores accordingly, and the adjustment factors are used to correct the corresponding evaluation information of both sides,so as to complete the first collaboration. Subsequently, the “Second Collaboration” between two sides is launched with the goal of evaluation information gathering. Firstly, based on the TOPSIS method, the corrected evaluation information of the subject and object sides is preliminarily fused respectively to obtain the comprehensive proximity degree, forming a comprehensive proximity matrix. Secondly, an ordered group clustering based on row division is proposed, and the grey relational clustering method is applied into the ordered group clustering based on the comprehensive proximity matrix of each side. Finally, based on the TDWA operator, the two-dimensional information of the comprehensive proximity is aggregated to obtain the comprehensive evaluation result of each side respectively. Then, the revised comprehensive opinions of two sides are aggregated to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results based on subject-object collaboration, and the second collaboration is completed.
Through a practical example of medical equipment supplier partners’ evaluation and selection, the proposed method is effectively applied. And the partner with the highest score is the best medical equipment supplier that decision maker should select. On this basis, in order to illustrate the rationality and effectiveness of this method, the collaboration process between the subject and object is removed and the method internal comparisons are conducted. The results show that the two collaborations effectively realize the interaction and fusion of heterogeneous preference opinions compared to the independent evaluation results of the subject and object without collaboration. Moreover, in order to illustrate its advantages, the group evaluation method based on subject-object collaboration in previous studies are further introduced to conduct the method external comparisons. The results show that the two collaborative processes could effectively enhance the accuracy and depth of the evaluation information interaction between two sides, the rationality and stability of the evaluation results are also improved. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that this method is mainly applicable to situations where the evaluation object has the ability ofactive conscious behavior. For this issue, the further in-depth research will be conducted in future to achieve its expansion in different application scenarios.

Key words: group evaluation based on subject-object collaboration, heterogeneous preferences, uncertain linguistic information, interval gray number, adjustment factor

中图分类号: