双元学习、行业与外来者劣势研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0410

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 220-226.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0410

双元学习、行业与外来者劣势研究

蔡灵莎¹, 杜晓君², 杨慧芳³, 张忠良⁴

1.浙江科技学院经济与管理学院,浙江杭州 310023;
2.东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁沈阳 110168;
3.嘉兴学院经济学院,浙江嘉兴 314001;
4.杭州电子科技大学管理学院,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2020-07-24 发布日期:2023-02-02
通讯作者: 张忠良(1986-),男,浙江嘉兴人,副教授,博士,研究方向为数据挖掘。
作者简介:蔡灵莎(1987-),女,浙江台州人,讲师,博士,研究方向为外来者劣势;杜晓君(1964-),女,辽宁营口人,教授,博士,研究方向为跨国管理;杨慧芳(1969-),女,浙江嘉兴人,教授,硕士,研究方向为风险管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(72171065);浙江省教育厅科研项目(Y201840036);杭州市哲学社会规划项目(Z19JC112);2022浙江科技学院教学研究与改革一般项目(2022-jg52);东北大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(N2006003)

Research of Ambidextrous Learning,Industry and Liability of Foreignness

CAI Ling-sha¹, DU Xiao-jun², YANG Hui-fang³, ZHANG Zhong-liang⁴

1. School ofEconomics and Management, Zhejiang University Of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;
2. School of Business Administration, NortheasternUniversity, Shenyang110168,China;
3. School ofEconomics, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing314001, China;
4. School of Business Administration, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2020-07-24 Published:2023-02-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 外来者劣势是影响跨国公司对外直接投资的重要因素。识别并克服外来者劣势是跨国公司在投资初期就需要考虑的问题。现有理论在探讨外来者劣势的克服策略上存在缺口,对学习模式与外来者劣势关系的关注较少。基于双元性视角,分析跨国公司采取利用、探索双元学习与外来者劣势之间的关系,并考察行业知识密集度的调节效应,构建了双元学习、行业与外来者劣势的概念模型。在理论分析基础上,以181家中国上市公司的1051次对外直接投资事件为样本进行实证检验。研究结果表明,组织学习在利用、探索上的双元均衡对外来者劣势具有负向影响;行业知识密集度会显著弱化双元均衡对外来者劣势的负向作用。研究结果从合理布局海外战略、关注行业特征等方面,为跨国公司降低外来者劣势提供了管理启示。

关键词: 双元学习, 外来者劣势, 行业, 利用式学习, 探索式学习

Abstract: Liability of foreignness is an important factor affecting the foreign direct investment of multinational corporations. Multinational corporations need to consider the problem of overcoming liability of foreignness in the early stage of OFDI. Existing theories have gaps in exploring strategies to overcome liability of foreignness, and pay less attention to the relationship between learning modes to liability of foreignness. Selecting 181 Chinese listed companies,1051 foreign direct investment events as samples, this paper analyzes the impact of ambidextrous learning on liability of foreignness, and the moderating effect of industry knowledge intensity. The results show that the balanced learning has a significant negative relationship with liability of foreignness; industry knowledge intensity can moderate the relationship between the balanced learning and liability of foreignness. From the aspects of reasonable layout the overseas strategy and focus on the industry characteristics, the results provide practical implications to weaken the liability of foreignness for multinational corporations.

Key words: Ambidextrous learning, liability of foreignness, industry, exploitation, exploration

中图分类号:

C931

蔡灵莎, 杜晓君, 杨慧芳, 张忠良. 双元学习、行业与外来者劣势研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(12): 220-226.

CAI Ling-sha, DU Xiao-jun, YANG Hui-fang, ZHANG Zhong-liang. Research of Ambidextrous Learning,Industry and Liability of Foreignness[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(12): 220-226.

参考文献

[1] 吴冰,阎海峰,杜子琳.外来者劣势:理论拓展与实证分析[J].管理世界,2018(6):110-126.
[2] Wu Z, Salomon, Robert. Deconstructing the liability of foreignness: regulatory enforcement actions against foreign banks[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, 48(2): 1-25.
[3] Gorostidi-Martinez H, Zhao, Xiaokang. Strategies to avoid liability of foreignness when entering a new market[J]. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2017, 14(1): 46-68.
[4] Mauri A, Song S, João N D F. Determinants of corporate international expansion beyond the home region: an empirical examination of U.S. MNEs’ expansion to europe and asia-pacific[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2017, 7(4): 1-12.
[5] 牟宇鹏,汪涛,周玲.外来者劣势下企业的国际化战略选择:基于制度理论的视角[J].经济与管理研究,2017,38(1):119-130.
[6] Ortiz B, Donate, Mario J, Guadamillas, Fátima. Inter-organizational social capital as an antecedent of a firm’s knowledge identification capability and external knowledge acquisition[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018, 22(6): 1332-1357.
[7] Fornes, Gaston, Cardoza, Guillermo. Internationalization of chinese SMEs: the perception of disadvantages of foreignness[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2018, 55(1): 1-20.
[8] Agnihotri R, Gabler, Colin B, Itani, Omar S, et al. Salesperson ambidexterity and customer satisfaction: examining the role of customer demandingness, adaptive selling, and role conflict[J]. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 2017, 37(1): -15.
[9] March J G . Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
[10] Apostolos R, Panagiotis, Trivellas, Panagiotis, Polychroniou. The mediating role of quality on the relationship between cultural ambidexterity and innovation performance[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2017, 28(2): 1-15.
[11] Chen Y. Dynamic ambidexterity: how innovators manage exploration and exploitation[J]. Business Horizons, 2017, 60(3): 385-394.
[12] Miller S R, Parkhe A. Is there a liability of foreignness in global banking? an empirical test of banks’ x-efficiency[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 23(1): 55-75.
[13] 彭新敏,干晨静,黄海婷.双元学习与中国后发企业的技术追赶:国际化程度的调节效应[J].宁波大学学报:人文科学版,2019,32(2):87-93.
[14] Greve H R. Exploration and exploitation in product innovation[J]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2009, 16(5): 945-975.
[15] Suder G, Birnik, Andreas, Nielsen, Niklas, et al. Extreme case learning: the manager perspective on rare knowledge and capabilities development[J]. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2017, 15(1): 1-16.
[16] Prieto-Pastor, Isabel, Martín-Pérez, Víctor, Martín-Cruz, Natalia. Social capital, knowledge integration and learning in project-based organizations: a CEO-based study[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018, 22(8): 1803-1825.
[17] 蔡灵莎.双元学习,知识整合与对外直接投资绩效研究[J].软科学,2020,34(02):63-69.
[18] 齐昕,张军,金莉娜.组织双元性学习与企业竞争优势——基于多项式回归与响应面分析[J].软科学,2018(06):78-82.
[19] Tabeau K, Gemser G, Hultink E J, et al. Exploration and exploitation activities for design innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing Management, 2017, 33(3-4): 203-225.
[20] 伍勇,魏泽龙.知识探索,资源整合方式与突破性创新[J].科研管理,2017,38(12):11-19.
[21] Sinha S. The exploration-exploitation dilemma: a review in the context of managing growth of new ventures[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2015, 40(3): 313-323.
[22] 王凤彬,杨阳.跨国企业对外直接投资行为的分化与整合——基于上市公司市场价值的实证研究[J].管理世界,2013,234(3):148-171.
[23] 邓美薇.经济政策不确定性对企业绩效的影响——来自中国非金融类上市公司的经验证据[J].工业技术经济,2019,38(2):99-108
[24] Keen C, Yuanyuan Wu. An ambidextrous learning model for the internationalization of firms from emerging economies[J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2011, 9(4): 316-339.
[25] 徐娟.基于二元技术能力调节作用的技术多元化与企业绩效[J].管理学报,2017,14(1):63-68.
[26] 肖仁桥,陈忠卫,钱丽.异质性技术视角下中国高技术制造业创新效率研究[J].管理科学,2018,31(1):48-68.
[27] Bustinza O F, Gomes E, Vendrell-Herrero F, et al. Product-service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity[J]. R&D Management, 2019, 49(1): 33-45.
[28] 刘亭立,傅秋园.基于Meta分析的双元创新动因对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(21):176-183.
[29] 任兵,郑莹.外来者劣势研究前沿探析与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2012,34(2):27-34.
[30] Wu Z, Salomon R. Deconstructing the liability of foreignness: regulatory enforcement actions against foreign banks[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, 48(7): 837-861.
[31] 王燕妮.高管激励对研发投入的影响研究——基于我国制造业上市公司的实证检验[J].科学学研究,2011,29(7):1071-1078.
[32] Valtakoski A, Witell, Lars. Service capabilities and servitized SME performance: contingency on firm age[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2018, 38(4): 1144-1164.
[33] Sofka W, Zimmermann J. Regional economic stress as moderator of liability of foreignness[J]. Journal of International Management, 2008, 14(2): 155-172.
[34] 杨勃,许晖.企业逆向跨国并购后的组织身份管理模式研究[J].中国工业经济,2020,382(01):176-194.
[35] Hutzschenreuter T, Matt, Tanja. MNE internationalization patterns, the roles of knowledge stocks, and the portfolio of MNE subsidiaries[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, 48(9): 1131-1150.

双元学习、行业与外来者劣势研究

Research of Ambidextrous Learning,Industry and Liability of Foreignness

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	金正浩, 赵希男, 姜哲贻. 行业结构环境的序参量分析方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 74-80.
[2]	杨水利, 陈娜, 李雷. 数字化转型与企业创新效率——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 169-176.
[3]	王染, 徐运保. 基于双重差分模型的参与PPP项目与企业技术创新关系研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 226-232.
[4]	安小雪. 外资评级机构进入中国能否发挥“鲶鱼效应”?[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 144-148.
[5]	马占新, 张蕾. 复杂环境下银行业多指标风险评估方法及防控策略研究——基于中国省际面板数据的分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(12): 150-156.
[6]	于文华, 杨坤, 魏宇. 基于高频波动率模型与R-vine copula的行业资产组合风险测度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 132-138.
[7]	刘静一, 李彤, 简志宏. 中国股票市场行业间波动溢出非对称效应研究——基于“好的波动”和“坏的波动”分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 196-203.
[8]	王丹, 黄玮强. 基于信息溢出网络的我国行业关联性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 173-180.
[9]	邱磊,刘小兵. 中国铁路路网自然垄断属性及其管制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(12): 181-186.
[10]	鲁振宇, 孙超平, 董冬. 我国融资租赁产品定价特征及定价效果评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(12): 142-148.
[11]	王相宁, 郭桂圆. 汇率的就业传导渠道及其效应测算——基于中国制造业面板数据的实证研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(2): 170-177.