基于流程创新的供应链激励合同研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0368

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 161-166.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0368

基于流程创新的供应链激励合同研究

张盼¹, 江韶波²

1.海南大学管理学院,海南海口 570228;
2.南昌大学经济管理学院,江南南昌 330031

收稿日期:2020-02-17 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-14
作者简介:张盼(1989-),男,湖北黄冈人,副教授,博士,研究方向:物流与供应链管理;江韶波(2000-),男,江西南昌人,硕士研究生,研究方向:物流与供应链管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71961019,71961008)

Research on Supply Chain Incentive Contracts Based on Process Innovation

ZHANG Pan¹, JIANG Shao-bo²

1. Management School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China

Received:2020-02-17 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对由一个零售商两个制造商组成的竞争供应链,建立了零售商处于领导地位的Stackelberg博弈模型。分析了收益分享合同和成本分担合同下流程创新效率和竞争强度对流程创新水平和供应链成员利润的影响,并探讨了最优激励合同类型。研究发现,流程创新效率的降低会使得制造商流程创新水平和供应链成员利润降低;竞争强度的增大会使得制造商流程创新水平和供应链成员利润增加。此外,在流程创新效率较高和竞争强度较低时零售商提供收益分享合同有利,在流程创新效率较低和竞争强度较高时零售商提供成本分担合同有利。

关键词: 供应链, 流程创新, 收益分享合同, 成本分担合同

Abstract: For a competitive supply chain consisting of two manufacturers and one retailer, a Stackelberg game model with the retailer as a leader is established. The impact of process innovation efficiency and competitive intensity on process innovation level and supply chain members’ profit under revenue sharing contract and cost sharing contract are analyzed. It shows that the increase of process innovation efficiency will reduce the manufacturer’s process innovation level and supply chain members’ profit, and the increase of competitive intensity will increase the manufacturers’ process innovation level and supply chain members’ profit. In addition, it is advantageous for the retailer to provide revenue-sharing contracts when competitive intensity and process innovation efficiency are low, and it is advantageous for the retailer to provide cost-sharing contracts when competitive intensity and process innovation efficiency are high.

Key words: competitive supply chain, process innovation, revenue sharing contract, cost sharing contract

中图分类号:

F272

张盼, 江韶波. 基于流程创新的供应链激励合同研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(11): 161-166.

ZHANG Pan, JIANG Shao-bo. Research on Supply Chain Incentive Contracts Based on Process Innovation[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(11): 161-166.

参考文献

[1] Li C. Supplier competition and cost reduction with endogenous information asymmetry[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2020, 22(5): 996-1010.
[2] 张盼,邹图帮.信息不对称下供应链中流程创新激励合同设计[J].系统工程学报,2022,37(5):632-642.
[3] Reimann M, Xiong Y, Zhou Y. Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 276(2): 510-518.
[4] Zhong G, Zhou C. Product and process innovation: the implication of making comparisons between uniform pricing monopolist and second-degree price discriminating monopolist[J]. Applied Economics, 2020: 1-17.
[5] Chang S, Yue J, Wang X, Yu B. Managerial strategies for process innovation through the perspective of competition among supply chain members[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 296(7): 532-545.
[6] 汪涛,雷志明.创新还是模仿——生产目标对流程创新决策的影响[J].科研管理,2018,39(06):1-8.
[7] 钟根元,张娴,陈志洪.负外部性条件下上下游企业产品创新及过程创新动态分析[J].系统管理学报,2019,28(03):440-447,456.
[8] 李寿德,丁一珊.网络外部性条件下企业产品创新与过程创新动态控制研究[J].系统管理学报,2020,29(03):599-607.
[9] Tulika Chakraborty, Satyaveer S. Chauhan, Mustapha Ouhimmou. Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 208: 566-587.
[10] Li T, Zhang R, Zhao S, et al. Low carbon strategy analysis under revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts[J].Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 212: 1462-1477.
[11] Ji T, Xu X, Yan X, et al. The production decisions and cap setting with wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58(1): 128-147.
[12] Wang W, Zhang Y, Zhang W, et al. Incentive mechanisms in a green supply chain under demand uncertainty[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2021, 279: 123636.
[13] 江世英,李随成.考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(06):169-176.
[14] 李友东,谢鑫鹏.考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链企业减排成本分摊比较研究[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(10):65-73.
[15] 刘丛,黄卫来,郑本荣,等.考虑营销努力和创新能力的制造商激励供应商创新决策研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2017,37(12):3040-3051.
[16] 许格妮,陈惠汝,武晓莉,周驰.竞争供应链中绿色成本分担博弈分析[J].系统工程学报,2020,35(02):244-256.
[17] 罗新星,张鹏.可变促销努力下的动态供应链收益共享契约[J].系统工程学报,2020,35(01):120-129.
[18] 郭炜恒,梁樑.供应链碳减排成本分摊的合作博弈研究[J].预测,2021,41(2):83-89.
[19] 王能民,邹宇.基于供应链合作的技术创新投入激励机制研究[J].工程管理科技前沿,2022,41(2):8-16.
[20] Saha S, Banaszak Z, Bocewicz G, et al. Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer[J]. Operational Research, 2022, 22(4): 3713-3746.

基于流程创新的供应链激励合同研究

Research on Supply Chain Incentive Contracts Based on Process Innovation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	于静, 周驰, 罗志远. E-供应链竞争下自营品牌商的第三方零售渠道引入与定价策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 84-90.
[2]	邢鹏, 赵相如. 考虑衍生需求和粉丝效应的视频服务供应链质量努力策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 91-98.
[3]	孟丽君, 黄祖庆, 张宝友, 杨玉香, 程红亚, 扈裕晴. 质量约束下闭环供应链差异决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 99-106.
[4]	金亮. 退款保证对竞争供应链的影响:基于顾客退货行为视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 113-119.
[5]	孙嘉轶, 杨露, 姚锋敏. 考虑低碳偏好及碳减排的闭环供应链回收及专利授权策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 120-127.
[6]	张梁梁, 张盼. 需求信息不对称下供应链中流程与产品创新模式选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 128-134.
[7]	陈嘉琦, 赵秋红, 靳杰. 考虑政府补贴的原料回收与有机肥生产供应链博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 1-6.
[8]	王道平, 张可, 周玉. 政府奖惩机制下零售商主导的闭环供应链微分博弈策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 22-30.
[9]	卞文良, 潘岳, 王文宾, 全诗苑, 刘笑颜. 维修中心参与回收时闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 64-70.
[10]	扈衷权, 冯平平, 温浩宇, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于期望损失厌恶的供应链期权契约协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 71-78.
[11]	曹晓刚, 黄美, 闻卉. 考虑制造成本扰动的闭环供应链回收与协调策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 79-85.
[12]	曹裕, 戴泽宇, 吴堪. 产出随机下农业供应链的扶贫融资策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 131-138.
[13]	卢祥远, 吴志樵, 殷勇. 考虑税收因素的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 139-145.
[14]	肖敏, 张耀. 产能约束下的闭环供应链制造商合作策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 146-151.
[15]	王辰宇, 孙静春. 基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 61-66.