移动学习软件打卡返现的免费增值策略研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0236

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 193-199.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0236

移动学习软件打卡返现的免费增值策略研究

郭强¹, 叶燚¹, 李增禄²

1. 西南交通大学经济管理学院,四川成都 610031;
2. 河南大学商学院,河南开封 475004

收稿日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2022-08-17
作者简介:李增禄(1991-),男,河南宝丰人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向为回收再制造和质量信息披露。
基金资助:
四川省科技厅科技支撑计划项目(2015GZ0083-1,2017-RK00-0043-ZF);成都市哲学社会科学院项目(2019L17);中国铁路总公司支撑项目(N2018Z009-1)

Research on the Free Value-added Strategy of the Mobile Learning Software to Clock in and Cash out

GUO Qiang¹, YE Yi¹, LI Zeng-lu²

1. School of Economics & Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;
2. Business School, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China

Received:2020-03-28 Published:2022-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑网络外部性因素,研究移动学习软件打卡返现的免费增值策略。分别构建企业在垄断市场和竞争市场下的数学模型,得到不同市场结构下企业最优的产品价格、需求及利润,并通过均衡结果分析企业的策略选择。研究表明:①在垄断市场中,企业应当选择打卡返现策略,此时产品定价较高,付费市场需求较低。②在竞争市场中,对于企业2(劣势企业)而言,无论企业1(优势企业)采取何种策略,均不应选择打卡返现策略;对于企业1(优势企业)而言,只有当两家企业产品差异程度较大时,才应选择打卡返现策略。

关键词: 网络外部性, 移动学习软件, 打卡返现, 免费增值

Abstract: Considering network externalities, this paper studies the free value-added strategy of punch-in cashback of mobile learning software. The mathematical models of enterprises under monopoly market and competitive market are constructed respectively, and the optimal product price, demand and profit of enterprises under different market structures are obtained, and the strategic choice of enterprises is analyzed through the equilibrium results. The research shows that: In monopoly market, enterprises should choose punch-in cash-back strategy, and at this time, the product price is higher and the demand of payment market is lower. In the competitive market, for inefficient enterprises, no matter what strategy the efficient enterprises adopt, they should not choose the punch card cashback strategy. For high-efficiency enterprises, only when the products of the two enterprises differ greatly should they choose the punch-in cash-back strategy.

Key words: network externality, mobile learning software, check in and cash back, freemium

中图分类号:

F272.3

郭强, 叶燚, 李增禄. 移动学习软件打卡返现的免费增值策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 193-199.

GUO Qiang, YE Yi, LI Zeng-lu. Research on the Free Value-added Strategy of the Mobile Learning Software to Clock in and Cash out[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(7): 193-199.

参考文献

[1] 冯天幸, 姜雨妍,李屹麟,等.“打卡返现机制”背后的运营与发展研究——习惯养成类英语学习APP.中国商论,2019,27(24):137-139.
[2] Wang R, Wang Z. Consumer choice models with endogenous network effects. Management Science, 2017, 63(11): 3944-3960.
[3] 陈小艳, 耿维.免费增值模式中的最优定价与产品设计优化.工业工程与管理,2020,25(4):115-121,130.
[4] Lei X, Li Y J, Govindan K, et al. Return policy and supply chain coordination with network-externality effect. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(10): 3714-3732.
[5] Yi Y, Yang H. Wholesale pricing and evolutionary stable strategies of retailers under network externality. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259(1): 37-47.
[6] Toshimitsu T. Compatibility under differentiated duopoly with network externalities: a comment. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2014, 14(3): 331-335.
[7] Wetwitoo J, Kato H. High-speed rail and regional economic productivity through agglomeration and network externality: a case study of inter-regional transportation in Japan. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2017, 5(4): 549-559.
[8] Wu T, Zhang M, Tian X, et al. Spatial differentiation and network externality in pricing mechanism of online car hailing platform. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 219(1): 275-283.
[9] Shi Z, Zhang K, Srinivasan K. Freemium as an optimal strategy for market dominant firms. Marketing Science, 2019, 38(1): 150-169.
[10] Naskar M, Pal R. Network externalities and process R&D: a cournot-bertrand comparison. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2020, 103(1): 51-58.
[11] 周雄伟, 蔡丹,李世刚,等.基于网络外部性和质量差异化的产品定价策略.管理科学学报,2019,22(8):1-16.
[12] Chu J, Manchanda P. Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(6): 870-893.
[13] Anderson E G, Parker G G, Tan B. Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 2013, 25(1): 152-172.
[14] 王海平, 刘树林,林军.基于Hotelling模型的双寡头免费增值策略竞争分析.运筹与管理,2018,27(4):15-21.
[15] Cheng H K, Liu Y. Optimal software free trial strategy: the impact of network externalities and consumer uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(2): 488-504.
[16] Cheng H K, Li S, Liu Y. Optimal software free trial strategy: Limited version, time-locked, or hybrid. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 24(3): 504-517.
[17] Chu J, Manchanda P. Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(6): 870-893.
[18] Anderson Jr E G, Parker G G, Tan B. Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 2013, 25(1): 152-172.
[19] Hamari J, Hanner N, Koivisto J. Why pay premium in freemium services? a study on perceived value, continued use and purchase intentions in free-to-play games. International Journal of Information Management, 2020, 51(3): 102040.
[20] Zennyo Y. Freemium competition among ad-sponsored platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 2020, 50(1): 100848.

移动学习软件打卡返现的免费增值策略研究

Research on the Free Value-added Strategy of the Mobile Learning Software to Clock in and Cash out

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵菊, 王艳, 刘龙. 在线短租平台的盈利模式及定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 139-144.
[2]	陈小艳, 耿维. 两阶段免费增值商业模式中的定价优化与时序研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 9-16.
[3]	卢珂, 周晶, 林小围. 考虑交叉网络外部性的网约车平台市场定价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 169-178.
[4]	王先甲, 余子鹤. 网络外部性条件下差异化双边平台买者参与问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 1-9.
[5]	王海平, 刘树林, 林军. 基于Hotelling模型的双寡头免费增值策略竞争分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 15-21.
[6]	颜锦江, 郭春香, 龚浩. 面向网络外部性特征产品的供应链动态竞争策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 76-82.
[7]	张凯. 存在水平差异化的多寡头双边平台企业竞争研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(2): 249-255.