授权制造下碳交易对制造/再制造影响及协调机制研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0160

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 136-142.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0160

授权制造下碳交易对制造/再制造影响及协调机制研究

夏西强¹, 路梦圆¹, 徐春秋²

1.郑州大学商学院,河南郑州 450001;
2.郑州大学管理工程学院,河南郑州 450001

收稿日期:2021-06-24 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-07-20
通讯作者: 徐春秋(1983-),女,河南周口人,副教授,博士,研究方向为低碳供应链、物流与供应链管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学青年基金资助项目(71702174,71702712);教育部人文社科项目(21YJC630140,17YJC630183);河南省高校科技创新人才项目(21-CX-007)

Studying on the Impact of Carbon Trading on Manufacturing/Remanufacturing and Coordination Mechanism Based on Authorization Manufacturing

XIA Xi-qiang¹, LU Meng-yuan¹, XU Chun-qiu²

1. Business School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
2. School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received:2021-06-24 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在授权制造下,为分析碳交易对制造/再制造供应链影响和研究供应链协调机制,基于授权制造分别构建由一个原始制造商和一个再制造商参与的分散决策博弈模型和集中决策博弈模型,对比分析政府碳交易政策对两种决策模式最优解影响,并针对制造商分散决策导致的边际损失问题,给出固定授权费的协调机制。研究主要得到:无论分散决策还是集中决策,当碳交易价格大于某一阈值时,碳交易不仅可以降低两种产品对环境的影响,还增加消费者剩余;分散决策时,在碳交易下原始制造商可以通过降低单位授权再制造费用来增加利润;原始制造商和再制造商可以签订固定授权费的契约来协调供应链利润。

关键词: 碳交易, 授权再制造, 协调机制, 博弈论

Abstract: In order to analyze the impact of carbon trading on manufacturing/ remanufacturing and the coordination mechanism of supply chain based on authorization manufacturing, the game models involving an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a remanufacturer are respectively constructed for decentralized and centralized decision-making. Based on the optimal solution of decentralized and centralized decision-making model, the effects of carbon trading on the optimal solution of the two decision-making modes are compared and analyzed, and the coordination mechanism of fixed authorization fee is given to solve the problem of marginal profit loss of supply chain caused by decentralized decision-making. The main research results are as follows: when the carbon trading price is greater than a certain threshold, carbon trading can not only reduce the environmental impact of the two products, but also increase the consumer surplus, whether it is the decentralized decision or centralized decision; when making decentralized decision, the OEM can increase its profit through reducing authorization fee based on the carbon trading; the OEM and the remanufacturer can sign a contract with fixed authorization fee to coordinate supply chain profit.

Key words: carbon trading, authorization remanufacturing, coordination, game theory

中图分类号:

F272

夏西强, 路梦圆, 徐春秋. 授权制造下碳交易对制造/再制造影响及协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 136-142.

XIA Xi-qiang, LU Meng-yuan, XU Chun-qiu. Studying on the Impact of Carbon Trading on Manufacturing/Remanufacturing and Coordination Mechanism Based on Authorization Manufacturing[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(5): 136-142.

参考文献

[1] Han X H, Yang Q X, Jennifer S, et al. Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: receptivity, durability, and subsidy[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 193(5): 602-616.
[2] 王道平,李小燕,赵亮.碳交易机制下考虑制造商竞争的供应链协调研究[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(4):62-71.
[3] 赵晓敏,孟潇潇.授权模式下制造商与再制造商的演化博弈决策[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(2):129-136.
[4] 刘名武,吴开兰,许茂增.面向消费者低碳偏好的供应链减排成本分摊与协调[J].工业工程与管理,2016,21(4):50-57.
[5] Chang X Y, Li Y P, Zhao Y B, et al. Effects of carbon permits allocation methods on remanufacturing production decisions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 152(6): 281-294.
[6] 谭建,闫丽娜,李萌.单位与总量两种碳限额机制下的企业最优决策[J].系统科学学报,2021,29(4):68-71,76.
[7] Chai Q F, Xiao Z D, Lai K, et al. Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 203(5): 311-321.
[8] Chai Q F, Xiao Z D, Zhou G H. Competitive strategies for original equipment manufacturers considering carbon cap and trade[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 78(6): 1-21.
[9] 陈玉玉,李帮义,柏庆国等.碳交易环境下再制造企业生产及减排投资决策研究[J].控制与决策,2020,35(3):695-703.
[10] 陈玉玉,李帮义,柏庆国等.碳交易环境下政府循环率规制对生产者尽规模式的影响机理[J].管理工程学报,2020,34(4):154-160.
[11] 刁心薇,曾珍香,孙丞.混合碳政策下两产品供应链的协同研究[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(2):149-159.
[12] Hong X P, Govindan K, Xu L, et al. Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 256(3): 820-829.
[13] Zhang C T, Ren M L. Closed-loop supply chain coordination strategy for the remanufacture of patented products under competitive demand[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2016, 40(8): 6243-6255.
[14] 郑本荣,杨超,杨珺.专利保护下双渠道闭环供应链的定价与协调决策[J].系统工程学报,2017,32(1):103-113.
[15] 邹宗保,王建军,邓贵仕,刘锋.基于成本对比的制造商与授权再制造商博弈模型[J].系统工程学报,2016,31(3):373-385.
[16] 赵晓敏,孟潇潇,朱贺.专利授权模式下OEM与再制造商的博弈决策:基于OEM的绿色创新视角[J].管理评论,2020,32(4):132-145.
[17] 朱庆华,夏西强,李幻云.政府补贴与专利费用下制造与再制造博弈模型[J].系统工程学报,2017,32(1):8-18.
[18] 黄帝,周泓.考虑不同回收质量等级的再制造系统回收生产决策[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(10):102-112.
[19] Xia X Q, Li C Y, Zhu Q H. Game analysis for the impact of carbon trading on low-carbon supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276(3): 1-12.

授权制造下碳交易对制造/再制造影响及协调机制研究

Studying on the Impact of Carbon Trading on Manufacturing/Remanufacturing and Coordination Mechanism Based on Authorization Manufacturing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	黄肖玲, 任宇婷, 张佳安, 王丹, 陈继红, 罗勋杰. 基于低碳环保因素的“前港后厂”钢铁产成品运输网络优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 59-66.
[2]	秦娟娟, 李婧. 碳交易机制下资金约束制造商替代产品的最优生产策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 88-94.
[3]	尤天慧, 刘春怡, 曹兵兵. 考虑成员风险态度的零售商资金约束闭环供应链定价与回收决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 10-17.
[4]	范定祥, 李重莲, 王晓蕾. 基于Stackelberg博弈的闭环供应链回收模式选择及其优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 135-141.
[5]	姚佼, 唐庆云, 陈学敏, 郭晓峰, 熊杨辉. 基于DEA-博弈论模型的铁路电子车票实名制查验评价分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 165-170.
[6]	夏西强, 朱庆华. 授权再制造视角下再制造设计对制造再制造影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 212-217.
[7]	宋向南, 卢昱杰, 申立银. 碳交易驱动下建筑业主最优碳减排决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 65-71.
[8]	李小燕, 王道平. 碳交易机制下考虑竞争和信息非对称的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 47-52.
[9]	刘国山, 刁海璨. 高科技企业与知识型员工劳资之间的薪酬博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 6-10.
[10]	侯剑, 白雪斌, 周艳明. 供应链金融借贷市场中均衡解的存在性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 102-106.
[11]	夏良杰, 柳慧, 黄迎, 李友东, 孙莹. 碳交易规制下的制造商减排外包模式选择:定制vs订购?[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 199-205.
[12]	陈圻. 通用竞争战略研究方法论的历史反思——一个基于博弈与约束优化建模的新研究架构[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 71-81.
[13]	徐飞, 王红蕾. 交货期差异下的双渠道订货与协调优化策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 121-129.
[14]	张根明, 张曼宁. 基于演化博弈模型的产学研创新联盟稳定性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 67-73.
[15]	陈军. 考虑消费者选择行为的农产品质量分级博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 68-75.