考虑公平性的两阶段系统固定成本分摊DEA模型

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0154

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 93-100.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0154

考虑公平性的两阶段系统固定成本分摊DEA模型

昂胜, 范婷婷, 杨锋

中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2020-02-07 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-07-20
通讯作者: 昂胜(1987-),男,安徽肥东人,副教授,研究方向为多属性决策建模、组织绩效评价
作者简介:范婷婷(1994-),女,安徽无为人,硕士研究生,研究方向为数据包络分析;杨锋(1977-),男,湖北武汉人,教授,博士生导师。研究方向为决策方法与应用、供应链与运作管理、数据分析。
基金资助:
安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(2108085MG238);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71601173,71631006,71991464/71991460,71921001)

DEA Model for Fixed Cost Allocation in Two-stage Systems Based on Fairness

ANG Sheng, FAN Ting-ting, YANG Feng

School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2020-02-07 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对两阶段系统固定成本分摊问题,已有研究大多是基于效率不变性或构造满意度指标等提出不同方法,少有考虑固定成本分摊方案的公平性。本文首先通过非自利原则得到系统整体与各阶段的成本分摊上限,针对具有群组式组织结构的两阶段系统,提出新的固定成本分摊模型,所得分摊结果更为公平,最后通过实际算例验证了本文模型的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 数据包络分析, 两阶段系统, 固定成本分摊, 非自利原则

Abstract: Methods for fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems in most existing researches are based on the principle of efficiency invariance or the satisfaction degree. However, few of them consider the fairness of fixed cost allocation. This study first introduces the non-egoistic principle to obtain the upper bound of cost of the system and each stage, and then proposesa new fixed cost allocation model for two-stage systems with the group organizational structure, where the resulted allocating plan is fairer. Finally, the feasibility and applicability of the model are verified by a practical example.

Key words: data envelopment analysis, two-stage system, fixed cost allocation, non-egoistic principle

中图分类号:

N945.1

昂胜, 范婷婷, 杨锋. 考虑公平性的两阶段系统固定成本分摊DEA模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 93-100.

ANG Sheng, FAN Ting-ting, YANG Feng. DEA Model for Fixed Cost Allocation in Two-stage Systems Based on Fairness[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(5): 93-100.

参考文献

[1] 雷西洋,丁彦,李姚矿,赵茜.一种考虑子公司竞合关系的跨国公司固定成本分摊方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(7):1714-1720.
[2] 曾庆铎,孙玉华.基于DEA的输出包含收益的固定成本分摊方法[J].系统工程,2014,(10):154-158.
[3] Charnes A, Cooper W W. Programming with linear fractional functionals[J]. Naval Research logistics quarterly, 1962, 9(3-4): 181-186.
[4] Li F, Zhu Q, Liang L. A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 274(1-2): 347-372.
[5] Li F, Zhu Q, Chen Z. Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures[J]. Omega, 2019, 83: 139-154.
[6] Yu M M, Chen L H, Hsiao B. A fixed cost allocation based on the two-stage network data envelopment approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(5): 1817-1822.
[7] Ding T, Zhu Q, Zhang B, Liang L. Centralized fixed cost allocation for generalized two-stage network DEA[J]. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 2019, 57(2): 123-140.
[8] Chu J, Wu J, Chu C, Zhang T. DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches[J]. Omega, 2019: 102054.
[9] An Q, Wang P, Emrouznejad A, Hu J. Fixed cost allocation based on the principle of efficiency invariance in two-stage systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 283(2): 662-675.
[10] 张冉,冉伦,杜涛,李金林.考虑满意度的两阶段DEA固定成本分摊方法[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(2):138-149.
[11] Chen Y, Cook W D, Li N, Zhu J. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3): 1170-1176.
[12] Ang S, Liu P, Yang F. Intra-Organizational and inter-organizational resource allocation in two-stage network systems[J]. Omega, 2020, 91: 102009.
[13] Charnes A, Cooper W W. Programming with linear fractional functionals[J]. Naval Research logistics quarterly, 1962, 9(3-4): 181-186.
[14] Wang K, Huang W, Wu J, Liu Y N. Efficiency measures of the chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA[J]. Omega, 2014, 44: 5-20.

考虑公平性的两阶段系统固定成本分摊DEA模型

DEA Model for Fixed Cost Allocation in Two-stage Systems Based on Fairness

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	尤翠玲, 黄衍, 黄嘉文, 张杰豪, 温永仙. 考虑偏差值的中立型区间交叉效率研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 81-85.
[2]	斯琴, 马占新. 基于DEA交叉评价的模糊有效性度量方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 123-128.
[3]	朱运霞, 昂胜, 杨锋. 基于SMAA和公共权重的决策单元效率评价与排序[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 184-189.
[4]	吴辉, 昂胜, 杨锋. 基于前景理论的两阶段DEA交叉效率评价模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 53-59.
[5]	段永瑞, 景一方, 李贵萍. 基于两阶段DEA方法的中国商业银行效率评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 118-125.
[6]	韩伟一. 一种基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法的完善和扩展[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(11): 65-69.
[7]	范德成,李昊,刘贇. 基于改进DEA——以复相关系数为基准的滞后期的我国产业结构演化效率评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 195-203.
[8]	汪云林,韩伟一,葛虹. 基于虚拟决策单元的排序模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5): 111-115.
[9]	闫庆友, 陶杰. 中国生物质发电产业效率评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1): 173-178.
[10]	张浩, 杨佳妮, 苏翔, 葛世伦. 外源投入型两阶段制造系统网络DEA效率分析研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(5): 160-167.
[11]	李玉龙, 李忠富. 基于DEA和神经网络集成模型的我国基础设施投资有效性预测研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(6): 88-98.